MRO wrote to jimmylogan <=-
Re: Re: Charlie Kirk Murdered
By: jimmylogan to MRO on Mon Nov 03 2025 08:42 pm
then he got real pissed off and caused the flood that killed almost everything. and then he realized he went too far and said he
wouldn't do it ever again.
He didn't say He went too far, just that He wouldn't do it again.
:-)
i remember reading an interpretation where it said he regretted it and wouldn't do it again. if there is a god and all this is true then he probably did have regret since he promised to never do it again.
Crash the economy
Lead us into unnecessary war
Cause social unrest to the point of unnecessary loss of life
Lead to runaway inflation
Create chaos, allowing billionaire sponsors to consolidate power, create even bigger monopolies, buy distressed assets for pennies on the dollar and manipulate the markets to allow allies to benefit from insider trading.
Okay - I don't think I'm communicating my thoughts good enough. :-)
My point is if someone shared my religious beliefs/convictions
100% then we would, by default, agree on policy me thinks...
I would think it very easy that someone who matched my, or your, religious beliefs 100% might also be, for example, advocating policies that would:
Crash the economy
Lead us into unnecessary war
Cause social unrest to the point of unnecessary loss of life
Lead to runaway inflation
etc.
First, my beliefs are for the protection of life and personal
freedom. I don't see how those would lead us into unnecessary
war, not social unrest. However, society is constantly getting
worse and worse, so advocating for morals could be seen as
social unrest. But at the same time I don't advocate for safety
at the expense of lowering moral standards.
I don't have that much faith in my fellow man so, with that in mind, I would see that as messed up. I would find it difficult to be motivated to do anything if I knew I was going to die anyway.
You still didn't answer my question. What standard are you basing that
on?
He regretted making man -
Gen 6:6 The LORD was very sad that he had made man on the earth. His
Gen 8:21 Their smell was pleasant to the LORD. He said to
himself, "I will never put a curse on the ground again
because of man. I will not do it even though his heart is
always directed toward what is evil. His thoughts are evil
from the time he is young. I will never destroy all living
things again, as I have just done.
Dumas Walker wrote to JIMMYLOGAN <=-
I didn't say that your beliefs would. I am saying that someone who
shares your *religous beliefs* 100% might make a great *church* leader
but still be a very horrible choice as the leader of a *country*.
Which brings me back to my original point, people who vote *only* with their religious beliefs can cause a country a lot of problems if/when
they get what they want.
From what it sounds like, you are not one of those people, BTW.
MRO wrote to jimmylogan <=-
Re: Re: Charlie Kirk Murdered
By: jimmylogan to MRO on Tue Nov 04 2025 04:16 pm
He regretted making man -
Gen 6:6 The LORD was very sad that he had made man on the earth. His
just for further notice, if i see scripture i mash the space bar
Dumas Walker wrote to JIMMYLOGAN <=-
Gen 8:21 Their smell was pleasant to the LORD. He said to
himself, "I will never put a curse on the ground again
because of man. I will not do it even though his heart is
always directed toward what is evil. His thoughts are evil
from the time he is young. I will never destroy all living
things again, as I have just done.
In Genisis 9:12-17, God amends this promise to never destroying all
living things *by flood* again. This is also the section where the rainbow is first used as a sign of this covenant.
Dumas Walker wrote to JIMMYLOGAN <=-
In Genisis 9:12-17, God amends this promise to never destroying all
living things *by flood* again. This is also the section where the rainbow is first used as a sign of this covenant.
In Genisis 9:12-17, God amends this promise to never destroying all living things *by flood* again. This is also the section where the rainbow is first used as a sign of this covenant.
Exactly! But he didn't say he regretted it. That's the point
I was making. :-)
Dumas Walker wrote to JIMMYLOGAN <=-
In Genisis 9:12-17, God amends this promise to never destroying all living things *by flood* again. This is also the section where the rainbow is first used as a sign of this covenant.
"all" things by "flood", sounds like His attorney wrote in some
loopholes... :)
Okay - let me be a little more direct. If someone 'supposedly' shares
your belief but you think they would ruin things, do they really
share your beliefs?
In other words, if someone shares your beliefs about transgender,
that there is only two genders, would you support them? Because
if you believe that's not positive for the country as a whole,
then do you really have that belief to begin with?
Arelor wrote to jimmylogan <=-
That is an easy answer. The fact I agree with somebody does not mean he
is apt for a position. I might support his ideas but think he is not a good candidate because he is incompetent.
Okay - so if two candidates are both competent and capable, would you
vote for the one that shares your beliefs or not?
Okay - so if two candidates are both competent and capable, would you
vote for the one that shares your beliefs or not?
Yeah, if there was such a thing as a competent and capable candidate who share
my ideas, I would endorse him before others.
| Sysop: | cequra |
|---|---|
| Location: | Grimsby United Kingdom |
| Users: | 2 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 86:51:00 |
| Calls: | 194 |
| Files: | 8,821 |
| Messages: | 29,767 |