Re: Re: Before Bandwidth / Af
By: MRO to HusTler on Wed Jun 25 2025 03:07 pm

That's simply because people don't want to get caught with their pants
down without shit paper.>

people were going nuts about eggs too. all of a sudden they needed 30 dozen >eggs!

It looks like you were replying to a message from 2020.. Normally you complain >when other people reply to old messages.

Nightfox

hello autistic. I had an issue with my msg pointers and the post sent out before i deleted it.

I realized that i was on an older message but it sent out anyways.

fuck off,
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

MRO wrote to All <=-

people were going nuts about eggs too. all of a sudden they needed 30 dozen >eg

It looks like you were replying to a message from 2020.. Normally you complain
when other people reply to old messages.

Nightfox

hello autistic. I had an issue with my msg pointers and the post sent
out before i deleted it.

I realized that i was on an older message but it sent out anyways.
fuck off,

As usual, the actual FACTS mean nothing to you.

Would you deny that you often give people shit for replying to old
messages? But then when YOU do it, and somebody politely points that
out, you have a hissy fit and start calling them names?

Fuck off yourself, you retarded hypocrite punk.



... Ignorance can be cured. Stupid is forever.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Re: Re: nightfox
By: Gamgee to MRO on Wed Jul 02 2025 08:15 am

I realized that i was on an older message but it sent out anyways.
fuck off,

As usual, the actual FACTS mean nothing to you.

you boring fuckers get a huge hardon when you get an opportunity to
"correct" me.

Would you deny that you often give people shit for replying to old messages?

those people are doing it intentionally. i had an issue one time with a message pointer.

I literally nuked the post right away but it got sent off because i had
my xfers per day set too high. I've halfed it now.

But then when YOU do it, and somebody politely points that

out, you have a hissy fit and start calling them names?

nobody's having a hissy fit but you.
go back to blowing nick andre.

---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

MRO wrote to Gamgee <=-

Re: Re: nightfox
By: Gamgee to MRO on Wed Jul 02 2025 08:15 am

Would you deny that you often give people shit for replying to old messages?

those people are doing it intentionally. i had an issue one time with a message pointer.

They're not doing it intentionally, they just don't pay attention
because they're idiots. Exactly the same reason that you did it.

I literally nuked the post right away but it got sent off because i had
my xfers per day set too high. I've halfed it now.

"Halved" it.

But then when YOU do it, and somebody politely points that

out, you have a hissy fit and start calling them names?

nobody's having a hissy fit but you.

No hissy fit here, just asking you why you're such a hypocrite. But you
don't really need to answer, as we all already know why.

It's because you're an asshole and a douchebag.




... Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Re: Re: nightfox
By: Gamgee to MRO on Wed Jul 02 2025 06:51 pm

They're not doing it intentionally, they just don't pay attention because they're idiots. Exactly the same reason that you did it.

it's not a dick, don't take it so hard.

"Halved" it.

oh, fuck you.

No hissy fit here, just asking you why you're such a hypocrite. But you don't really need to answer, as we all already know why.

"we", you mean the boring leftovers of bbsing?

make sure you cup nick's balls when you're working on him.
or you can work on that boring stock bbs you've been running for years.
cant be bothered with that, can you?

---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: Re: nightfox
By: Gamgee to MRO on Wed Jul 02 2025 06:51 pm

Would you deny that you often give people shit for replying to old
messages?

They're not doing it intentionally, they just don't pay attention because they're idiots. Exactly the same reason that you did it.

Most of the time, I don't see what the big issue is with replying to an old thread. If someone wants to discuss the same topic, maybe add a question or something, why start a new thread when a thread already exists? I don't see why it would automatically mean they're an idiot.

I've also seen the same issue discussed on web forums.. Web forums often have a thread seach feature, and when searching for a topic, you often find dozens of threads about the same topic. Sometimes it's because people don't bother to search for existing threads to find their answer (which also may reduce the number of new threads started, which might have the same questions as other threads with the same topic).

Nightfox

---
þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

MRO wrote to Gamgee <=-

No hissy fit here, just asking you why you're such a hypocrite. But you don't really need to answer, as we all already know why.

"we", you mean the boring leftovers of bbsing?

No, the people who are actually active, and actually running a BBS.

make sure you cup nick's balls when you're working on him.

You seem to have some kind of fetish regarding Nick. Not sure why, but
it seems to bring out your natural homosexual tendencies. Maybe you
should just "come out".

or you can work on that boring stock bbs you've been running for years. cant be bothered with that, can you?

LOL, you must have been sneaking around the wrong one, as mine isn't
stock by any stretch. Stop by and check it out.

Why don't you tell us all the actual ADDRESS of *YOUR* BBS so we can
check it out.... OH, that's right - you don't actually run a BBS.

<GUFFAW>



... Ignorance can be cured. Stupid is forever.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Re: Re: nightfox
By: Nightfox to Gamgee on Wed Jul 02 2025 18:48:28

Most of the time, I don't see what the big issue is with replying to an old thread. If someone wants to discuss the same topic, maybe add a question or something, why start a new thread when a thread already exists? I don't see why it would automatically mean they're an idiot.

I never reply to old posts. How old that is depends on the amount of traffic for that group. Usually it's either no earlier than a month for slow groups, or 50 posts for active groups. With the number of groups I follow, there's just not enough time for anthing more.

---
þ Synchronet þ End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com